So my first weekend waiting for replies has passed and it was suspenseful. Even though it was the weekend and I know agents get days off too, I still checked my email a dozen times or so. I also read a book and a half (which for as slow a reader as I am, is kind of impressive). Jonathan Stroud is currently keeping me company through my wait. I first read his new book, The Screaming Staircase, and since the library doesn’t have the sequel yet (I think it just came out), I’ve begun his Bartimaeus Trilogy. They’re great books. In depth worlds, snarky characters, full of adventure and misconceptions and bad guys. I can’t recommend them highly enough. Especially if you’re waiting for replies.
So, the point of this post: I have a good friend who is very cautious and she reminds me to be cautious until we know the rules. Last night, she pointed out to me that my naming the agents rejecting me and my reactions to these rejections might not be the smartest decisions. If they, or other agents, stumble across my page they might see a review of my encounters with them and think my post is an attack on them when, really, I am posting for educational purposes, so others might know the possibilities of what lies ahead (and so I don’t have to repeat my rejection notification a hundred times so everyone can hear. That just makes it worse.) So, under my friend’s suggestion, I have made a few edits to the posts which could be construed as negative. I’m not doing this so anything reflects badly on the agents or their agencies. So, from now on, unless I have a very positive experience with an agent, there won’t be anymore names. I’ll still cross them off on the Rounds page so you can see who is in the running, but no more names.